Scarfski/entt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

doc: updated README

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Michele Caini
2023-11-20 16:46:44 +01:00
parent 7fecbf7e03
commit 838d0e5f76
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
README.md
View File

@@ -196,7 +196,11 @@ comparison (this should already tell you a lot). Many of these benchmarks are
completely wrong, many others are simply incomplete, good at omitting some
information and using the wrong function to compare a given feature. Certainly
there are also good ones but they age quickly if nobody updates them, especially
when the library they are dealing with is actively developed.
when the library they are dealing with is actively developed.<br/>
Out of all of them, [this](https://github.com/abeimler/ecs_benchmark) seems like
the most up-to-date project and also covers a certain number of libraries. I
can't say exactly whether `EnTT` is used correctly or not. However, even if used
poorly, it should still give the reader an idea of where it's going to operate.
The choice to use `EnTT` should be based on its carefully designed API, its
set of features and the general performance, **not** because some single